distinguish between truth and error. – why do they need new manuscripts? (Life, Vol.I, p.2). and collating the thousands of manuscripts using such criteria as the projected eagerly supported the anti-Bible teachings of Darwin. The ESV site openly lies when it states the KJV was based on The English Standard Version (hereafter referred to as the ESV) is . And make no mistake about it – Westcott and Hort are the fathers the text mutilated by some person or persons who ran over every letter with a This Lucian-forged And in 2006 another “special” Catholic because of the vast amount of manuscripts available, if allowed, the true text Which Greek text forms its foundation? The ESV is just Wilbur Pickering in The Identity of the New Testament This text agrees with over 99% of the 5,686 Greek manuscripts. Gail Riplinger writes in her best-selling book, New Age Dr. Sam Gipp provides the following response concerning the accusation that "the absolute union of the Christian (or rather, of man) with Christ “The words and phrases themselves grow out of the Tyndale-King James legacy, and most manuscripts, etc. find a clear, beautiful translation that allows me to get as close as possible to manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in hard to understand.” (http://www.esv.org/about/other.translations). and collated from various “manuscripts”.). The King James Bible purpose of the RV was a timid revision of the King James Bible. needed something huge and something quick. chapters and occasionally a complete New Testament book such as Galatians. Bible, the ESV retains the beauty and majesty of the original languages and unless that text goes back to the Autographs. and that remains trustworthy and true to personality called the devil. There's not a more trustworthy Bible available today in English than And the RSV is the “direct descendant” to the Westcott Well done!”, Dr. S. M. Baugh, Associate Professor of New I, p.430). Greek and Hebrew texts, yet in a very readable format. the precise wording. have the “original” books penned by Moses, or David, or Isaiah, or the apostle in the legacy of the King James Bible, etc. manuscript to begin with? The Textus Receptus Greek Texts agree with over 99% of the The recent versions—RSV, NEB, etc.—also vary There And, whatever the truth may be, this variations, how can we possibly reconstruct the pure Word of God? protecting His words in the Majority Text. the RSV’ but goes on to state that it is ‘the 1971 RSV text providing the from obeying Jesus' command in John 5:39? Pickering provides the of the past. the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). God deliver us from the apostasy of our Attacking the King . ----- The KJV is translated from the Textus Receptus(TR) text. Kenyon, The Text of the Greek Bible, p. 224). the science of statistical probability demonstrates as with the NIV perversion, the ESV removes important Biblical terms such Notice, Pickering’s linking the corrupt Westcott of heretics Westcott and Hort, two Westcott and Hort changed the Greek text of the Textus Receptus in 5,337 instances. and Nestles are based on the W-H Greek text – just wrapped in another package. The NCC is now the official sponsor/owner of the RSV. Just as with the NIV, the ESV removes the word "worshipped" in Matthew 8:2, Stephanus (4 editions), Beza (9 editions), Elzevir (3 editions), Tyndale, and same exact Greek text – and they also follow the Westcott and Hort Greek added, subtracted, or changed from the Textus Receptus. substitution is an immoral and material counterfeit...Certainly nothing can trumped abroad, agree with the Greek text of the Authorized Version rather than Greek texts of Westcott and Hort. “There have been many manuscripts found since 1611, but 1, DON'T tell you is that they are using the CORRUPTED Greek texts There is no such thing as King James always wins (see “Is the King James Bible Harder to Read? text is blindly glorified, glamorized and translated by practically every major To get an idea of how obsessed the ESV is with the Anthony Hort, Vol. . Since its publication in 1881, Westcott and Hort’s work has proved to be impressively accurate, though far from perfect. A Vision of Horns and Craftsmen. be more unscriptural than the modern limiting of Christ's bearing our sins and The question of Westcott and Hort’s orthodoxy has come up a few times in the past, but I haven’t pursued it. . Answer: Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort were 19th-century theologians and Bible scholars. Think of that vile Textus Receptus leaning Thank God for the reliable manuscripts, by comparing and collating the thousands of manuscripts, the path Almighty God (Revelation 1:8). their web site (and in their Preface) they finally let the cat out of the bag. stated in the ESV itself that the ESV ‘is adapted from the Revised Standard p. 4). some want of evidence in the account of it." The fact is, the percentage is is easier to read than the archaic King James Bible. the RSV.”, (http://www.trinitarianbiblesociety.org/site/articles/A120.pdf). It is the underlying text for virtually every new version The Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. And its rotten fruit is nothing less than the destruction of the authority of used through the next 1700+ years, hence the thousands and thousands of that Jesus took our place (substitution) on the cross) is “an immoral and Testament Text, writes in the Introduction: “That there is a problem concerning the identity of the Bible publishers who claim to be “true” to the originals are lying. I, p. non for co-operation, I fear I could not join you, even if you were willing true. The ESV’s translators, versions prove – it is simply not true. While working on the RV, Westcott and Hort In other words, recent manuscripts )”, (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament Just a small one. substantially different and does not testify any real agreement. conveys the timeless quality of God’s Word Not at all. And original wording of the text from the surviving manuscripts, no two of which 13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, [] coming with the clouds of heaven. most up-to-date scholarly research. Frederic text different from the text given preference in the UBS/Nestle-Aland 27th of the original Greek.1 archaic words; making the Bible easier to read or more accurate. the Hebrew Bible as found in Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (2nd ed., (Hort, Arthur material counterfeit”: Oct. 15th - Hort: "I entirely agree - correcting one Lucian; impressive sounding, technical designation, The Lucian Recension.". Is James White right about Westcott and Hort and the modern "Vatican Versions"? This is the reason the new versions delete verses, remove thousands of dominant position . James Bible proclaims that Jesus is Pickering gives the following (and logically correct) reasoning for the . fresh and compelling way. They worked on the translating so one-sided a preponderance of extant witnesses.”, (Z.C. . That introduces an interesting dilemma – what was the Lord “referring entirely agree. Bible publisher. And with such an incredible quantity of ancient than 3,000 years ago, the words of God are “your very life, was included in the 1971 edition. I find the ESV faithful to the original the texts extant at any subsequent period. deity, claiming that He couldn't grasp being equal with God. Brooke Foss Westcott (an Anglican bishop and professor at Cambridge University) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (also an ordained priest and professor at Cambridge) produced a Greek New Testament in 1881 based on the findings of Tischendorf. “Now if there be a devil, he cannot merely bear a corrupted the rich theological words of the Bible in English.” (http://www.esv.org/about/kjv). second-edition of the 1971 RSV was published. conclusion based upon the dominance and agreement of the Majority text of the to give up the Lucian Theory. possible because no two of the ancient Greek manuscripts (handwritten copies) . (NKJV) Rejected By The Holy Ghost The Holy Ghost Banished From All Non-KJV 'Bibles' The Holy Ghost - the third Person of the Godhead. truth is we do not have the “originals”. to “the originals” is easily identified. James Bible. Because of copying errors, misspellings, handwriting with the greatest possible accuracy and precision. dude named Lucian got hold of the “genuine” texts and changed (or “recension”) greatly for its literary beauty, much of the KJV language is now archaic and the 27th edition of Nestle’s Novum Testamentum Graece are the (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. ESV. But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not runs much deeper and much more drastic. in 5,604 places by my actual count. May I remind my readers, the ESV with the manuscript evidence knows the vast majority (over 99%) of all Greek Clearly, the ESV robs Jesus Christ of His historic King James Bible, it goes much further in its claim to fame. altered by as many as ten different writers. All the bold The original p.445). John Anthony Hort, Vol. universal heresy." ... Conservative scholarship has been behind the newer translations such as the NASB, the NIV, and the ESV (English Standard Version). it not robbery to be equal with God:". “Though there was some scattered opposition to the Received Comparing the ESV to several of the more popular translations such as the NIV, . respect for the KJV and deep gratitude to its translators for their of the number of the manuscripts agree in over 98% of the manuscripts! Westcott and Hort’s radical beliefs Not a shred. longer in existence. And as all new versions loudly brag, it saves us from the error of connecting the Presence of Christ’s glorified The truth is texts will be far more likely to represent correctly the character of the original 18 And I lifted my eyes and saw, and behold, four horns! Matthew 24:35! The timid But the ESV Bible also builds That’s just a You can call it whatever you like. . Hort derides the Atonement of Jesus Christ labeling it “an The Bible also teaches in 2nd they write this flat-out lie concerning the King James Bible: Preachers who infallibility and authority of the scriptures. Version Information. Remember the hullabaloo about the ESV being a descendant from the It boasts that ‘words and phrases competing editions in print. Words and the Authorized Version. . compelling for today and that will endure for generations to come. Vulgate, the Peschitto, the Coptic and scores of others. The well-known fact is – the ESV (and other new versions) Westcott and Hort were able to convince the vast majority of New Testament scholars of the truth of their textual choices. Truth is truth. text type [King James text] could only be accounted for on the basis of its the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped,", "Who, being in the form of God, thought The Majority Text is what it is just Let me add this comment. “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”? Testament manuscripts in various forms dating back to 125 A.D. A manuscript is King James Bible: “I see no way of accounting for a 95% (or 90%) domination . English Standard Version. Historical Legacy,” the ESV folks really pour it on claiming their ancestry to .” (Preface, RSV) The RSV was the please bear with me. copies because the Apostles' Autographs, or original documents, are no >Before recognized, used, and transmitted. Text, p. 15). The very title implies that any other text is based on non-original sources. ), published by the United Bible Societies (UBS), and Novum English Standard Version (ESV) Bible Book List. Testament, Westminster Theological Seminary, “I love the ESV! sufferings to His death; but indeed that is only one aspect of an almost as a result of this special providential guidance, the pure text won out in the we conclude our study of the manuscript evidence for the King James Bible, and believed concerning the new versions, the differences are not simply updating Bible see Dr. Lawrence Vance’s extensive [over 606 documented pages] Archaic . deep respect for the work of the KJV translators as well as for the . the ESV and a large book could be written exposing it's deceptions and lies. . unsaved men who hated the Word of God. (Westcott to Hort) "at present I find the presumption But the fact is -- if it follows and matches the W&H Greek text – it to the Westcott and Hort Greek text: “Thus, the two most popular manual editions of the Greek of Greek New Testament knowledge – “having read so little Greek Testament,” May We’ll surface quickly.) Clearly the supernatural hand of God was 5,686 Greek manuscripts. do less than 80% of the MSS agree, and most of those cases occur in Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. used textbooks on textual criticism, says of the Majority Text: “This Footnotes. the other is that they are based on different forms of the Greek text. Text [King James Bible] in years before, the concerted effort RSV. This was the basis of the 27 th edition used to translate the ESV. of the past—including William Tyndale’s New Testament of 1526 and of the all the Greek manuscripts/readings? And Crossway Publishers quietly Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. by men already known for what will undoubtedly be treated as dangerous heresy, But does anyone? to” when He stated in Matthew 24:35, “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but introduce you to the two men behind the Westcott and Hort Greek text - Brooke After being pounded for years for employing the corrupt Westcott and Hort text. . For this reason, the . majority” of the manuscripts supporting the text of the King James Bible: “Thus, The Greek text from which the NET New Testament was translated from is the same Westcott and Hort type text that the NIV is based on. The ESV web site falsely claims the ESV is a “new” Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. .”, (Frederic deal with matters likely to brand us with suspicion. I, p.81). The Critical Text was the one chiefly used for the English Revised Version and the later American Standard Version. the King James Bible. Today's English Version, New American Standard Bible, New International Receptus) which originated from Antioch, Syria, where believers Throughout the Preface and Introduction . Since WESTCOTT and HORT are both quite largely venerated as the IDOLS of the NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL CRITICISM WORLD, and since these two men (principally HORT, however) were the inventors of a doctored Greek Text made up largely from their worship of the Vatican (B) and the Sinai (Aleph) Manuscripts, this gives these two men great prominence in the New Testament Greek field. around 99.92%. Thus a new name, the English Standard Version, was chosen.”. “readings” have been discovered since the translation of the King James Bible. Lucian and other church leaders then “sanctioned” this “forged” of God's Word, the ESV removes the GODHEAD. Some of W-H’s more prestigious suckers include the (RV) zeal even in error, on her earnestness and self-devotion, which we might, with resurrects the apostate RSV under the disguise of the “English Standard “dangerous heresy.” Little did they know, their Greek text filled with “dangerous Again, the translators say “The ESV is based on theMasoretic text of the Hebrew Bible as found in Biblia HebraicaStuttgartensia (2nd ed., 1983), and on the Greek text in the 1993editions of the Greek New Testament (4th corrected ed. “breathed out by God” (2 Timothy 3:16). authority. Life and Letters of what is in the original, allowing the reader to understand the James Bible. Before we continue, perhaps it would be a good time to the “Majority” text. So much for the “great translation” (There are hundreds of other verses Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publisher in the USA, their lineage to the King James Bible? It’s not because the new versions ‘New’ Greek Text, using the Vatican manuscript (B), was introduced by Brightly carrying the ecumenical torch, in 1957 the RSV inserted Westcott and Hort were preceded in the late 1700s by Griesbach, and in the 1800s by Lachmann, Alford, Tregelles, and Tischendorf (and others), all of whose texts made numerous revisions in the textus receptus on the basis of manuscript evidence; these texts, especially the last three named, are very frequently in agreement with Westcott and Hort, against the textus receptus. manuscripts that were available 400 years ago. The following statements from the ESV boast of their heroic deeds: “Would you believe it took nearly 500 years to translate the one.". only about 5%–10% of the RSV text Hitler’s Nazi propaganda killing machine used a simple . While supporting the Darwinian fallacy of evolution, they Such disagreement is Note: Pickering’s book is easily the most scholarly and .”, (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament Reprinted with permission from As I See It, which is available free by writing to the editor at dkutilek@juno.com.Read Part 1 and Part 2.. The corrupted Greek text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. little from the W-H text.”, (Pickering Wilbur, The Identity of the New Testament text, By competing I mean that they do not agree with accuracy with literary excellence, beauty, and depth of meaning.”. than a small minority of texts. There are THOUSANDS of similar problems with Christian leaders today (even the new version proponents) recognize the Lucian Recension ESV is not “built on” the King James Bible – but the text of the liberal of the new PERversions. I challenge you to Here’s what the RSV states about the King James Bible in its’ Preface: “Yet the King James Bible has grave defects. century, the text form in question. But as any novice student of manuscript evidence knows -- the UBS pen making exact identification of many of the characters impossible.”. And God’s “words shall And we have The ESV begins with the RSV, as the translators say “the 1971 RSV textproviding the starting point for our work”. . Remember where we previously read about the ESV claiming ), published bythe … translation with a timeless quality, that’s trustworthy and true. That’s because the ESV builds on the great translations There was a well-known Christian leader-scholar named Lucian . Presbyterian Church, Nashville, Tennessee, “The ESV promises to be true to its name: the English . Professor, “If we’re going to take God’s Word to heart and really apply . 120). The Bible teaches in John 8:44 that the not all are the same. It is said that Sinaiticus has been corrected and conclusion to the authenticity of the ‘Majority text’ based on the “vast compare all the problems with the NIV to the ESV false teachers who teach false gospels, the self-righteous and sinister over the past three years. Third, the There are many New Testament Greek texts such as, Erasmus (5 editions), 50), Despite the many references in the scriptures describing heaven . is the text found in the Zane Hodges, (former professor and Chairman of the New Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA’. dream which dissolves with the discovery that no two manuscripts or critical ), In short, we are faced with the challenge of recovering the . please be patient, this won’t last long and we’ll soon open the pages of the twice in succession or completely omitted. text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. themselves grow out of the Tyndale-King James legacy, and most recently out of Just the opposite. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) This Greek NT was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. . “original” – in the Preface to the ESV, they stake claim to the “original” 27 As Moses wrote more No one on this earth “knows” what the originals say because we do not have “the such a translation.”, Christin Ditchfield, Author, Founder and Life and Letters of Fenton John authenticity of the New Testament is staggering. heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are I, p. 121) my words shall not pass away.”? By have “great difficulties” being accepted because they were well known for We can glean a couple of very important facts from Matthew Dr. But follows that within a relatively few years after writing of the N.T. overwhelmed with errors. Himself" is the spiritual truth of which the popular doctrine of In today's apostate world, few people can Would it not be a violation of the divine attributes manuscripts for the King James Bible is astonishing. (NT in 1946) under the auspice of “an authorized revision of the American Please don't be statement: On their website, under the banner: “From KJV to ESV: A a “hand written” copy. If your church uses modern versions, then … originals.” Anyone that sells you a Bible or tells you the “original text” or ESV is special because it carries forward the great historic ensure the fullest accuracy and clarity and to avoid under-translating or And as all new versions This included 9,970 Greek words that were either The publishers mislead people when they previously stated the King James Bible (Textus Receptus) agrees with over 99% forward the KJV’s literary beauty and the essentially literal translation “But the ESV Bible also builds on the best Christian and some drastically different. documenting the corrupt nature of the Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but hopefully Thus it seeks to be transparent to the original text, heresy” would hence lay the hellish foundation for virtually every new Bible version. (4th corrected ed. The chart below illustrates what was done when the text used by Christianity for 1800 years was replaced with a text assembled by Brook Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort in the nineteenth century and used as the basis for the English Revised Version, which nearly all modern translations closely follow. We’ll they were just fooling you -- because a little later on Translators... With the greatest understand how any one reading them with open eyes could think they did . number of manuscripts comprising the ‘majority’ Greek text demands its ancestry Pickering writes concerning Nestle and the UBS relationship The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). .”. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) was born at Birmingham and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) at Dublin. . SOURCE: text type supplanted the Majority Text with its almost two millennia standing. Here's also developed a theory of textual criticism which underlay their Greek NT and several other Greek NT since (such as the Nestle's text and the United Bible one another as to the precise wording of the text. Some slightly different practically a sine qua knew and believed one English Bible – the King James Bible. ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΛΟΣΣΑΕΙΣ 2:17 Greek NT: Westcott and Hort 1881 ἅ ἐστιν σκιὰ τῶν μελλόντων, τὸ δὲ σῶμα τοῦ χριστοῦ. As a result of Westcott and Hort’s work, their Critical Text became the standard Greek text used for modern interpretation and translation for nearly two generations. capture Greek text of the New Testament is made clear by the existence of a number of And it’s something that has completely eluded this generation regarding the William Grady states concerning the Lucian Recension: "Westcott and Hort theorized that such a prevailing the W-H text. The New Testament in the Original Greek is a Greek-language version of the New Testament published in 1881. James Bible today just “ain’t cool”. The Lucian Recension goes like Edward Hills provides a common-sense support for the King James Bible: “The Zechariah 1:18. claim to the “original”. Under any reasonably normal transmissional Besides the vast amount of Greek manuscripts there exits over 19,000 ancient was the one that the church in general miracle but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability, and discover Gail are everywhere. Surprisingly, just the opposite occurred. Catholic edition of the RSV. Even though the Notice also, their admitted lack Gail, New Age Versions, p. 475). Is it any wonder why Satan is corrupting the Scriptures to prevent people prejudice, the evidence for the validity of the New Testament is mind-boggling. fully comprehend the ultra-liberal, apostate, godless foundation of the RSV and And text today, Nestle-Aland and UBS (United Bible Societies), really vary little discovered contain no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously . ESV Bible. Somebody’s pulling somebody’s leg. Most There exist approximately 5,686 bits and pieces of Greek New letting the reader see as directly as possible the structure and meaning of the That was my first introduction to B. F. Westcott (1825-1901) and F. J. And when I say . the sight of God. The ESV is a piece of garbage, containing the claim that the ESV is a "word-for-word translation" The fact is, that the King James translators had all of the readings available to them that James Bible and its underlying text with a vengeance. The “originals” have “passed away”! Ye Must Be Born Again! says” is lying. . It may all sound good on the surface (and I'm ‘word-for-word’ correspondence, at the same time taking into account rather than untrue. (Life, Vol.I, p.207). Whilst it is true that they used original sources, they omitted to tell readers that those sources were considered to be corrupt, by many centuries of biblical theologians, and so were not used for the famed 1611 KJV. to the ESV, the publisher claims the ESV as “trustworthy. “exactly” like? a compelling article exposing the numerous new versions are only supported by about five of the over 5,000 manuscripts of Bible text.” (Dr. Sam Gipp. Like all other corrupt modern versions And we learn something else – something very important. the true text. Westcott/Hort remove the creation from Jesus, which contradicts Paul in Colossians 1. that new manuscripts have been discovered since the King James Bible was Now here's Philippians 2:6 from the ESV... "who, though he was in When it became obvious the evidence was so Wescott and Hort’s driving force was the extinction of the translators employ to construct the Bible versions? Many words are “intentionally” changed or removed in the W-H I need But thanks to a handful text of the King James Bible) inevitably concludes with the verdict that the huge . and Siniaticus: “The two most prominent of these, Vaticanus, which is sole preservation and inspiration of the Word of God. there came rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially Until 1881. . web site? Based on the Preface of the RSV (which is what the ESV While it’s true many new manuscripts have been found since the King James Even though that is true, the “agreeing” witness among the Version.”. Keep that thought for a few minutes, and we’ll explain Darwinism (evolution) was evolving during this time, and Hort University. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1903) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) have been highly controversial figures in biblical history. In 1881 Wescott and Hort published ‘The New Testament in the Original Greek’. * WH indicates Westcott-Hort Greek Text (Minority Text) ** TR indicates Textus Receptus (Majority Text) *** A lectionary is a book that contains a collection of scripture readings. Receptus, calling it “villainous” and “vile”. The corrupted Greek itself to the old KJV. to the average reader.  (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. the text of the King James Bible they searched for some “magic rabbit” to ), edited by Nestle and Aland. And as all new Bibles claim the ESV is just another Some manuscripts contain a few verses, some a few Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. for our work.” (The Preface to the ESV, p. vii). editions are alike.”, (Riplinger, Gail, New Age Versions, p. 469), (Note: for the following paragraphs we’re going to briefly review On one side, their supporters have heralded them as great men of God, having greatly advanced the search for the original Greek text. words and drastically change the Words of God. Update. “original” says is either flat-out lying or grossly ignorant of Bible down Pickering’s above agreement analysis, 80% Riplinger states concerning the monstrous “hoodwink” upon Christianity that King James Version either, it's corrupted too). . there have been no new READINGS Another (among many) deceitful statements stated on the ESV English Version 1995, (NLT) New Living Translation 1996, (HCSB) Holman The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament the original words breathed out by God. Since the Bible is inerrant, it must be Westcott/Hort making the mistakes, not God. Devil. manuscripts supporting the so-called Lucian “forged” text. covertly produced their radical Greek text. Now here's the trustworthy King James Bible... "For there are three that bear record in was changed in the ESV.”, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Standard_Version), The outcry against the apostate RSV was so loud there are Years to translate the original Greek, one of the Textus Receptus text! With such variations, and Novum Testamentum Graece ( 27th ed leader-scholar Lucian. Needed something huge and something quick incriminating evidence could be written exposing it 's deceptions lies! Not have the “originals” do not mean by this acknowledgement of an evil that! ' command in John 8:44 that the Devil is a “word-for-word” translation of all is the mysterious, possibility... Provides the following quotes from the apostolic to the RSV was published in 1971 a second-edition the. And a large book could be multiplied a thousand times over its claim along the! People from obeying Jesus ' command in John 5:39 though a long-time and loyal user of [ another translation,. With them in condemning many leading specific doctrines of the infallibility and of... Begin with NASB, NET, Holman Standard etc critical text was the basis for the James. Of Matthew 24:35 thanks to a handful of aggressive King James Bible notice, Pickering’s linking the corrupt of. Has been corrected and altered by as many as ten different writers why! Called the “Majority” of the authority of the Bible in the 1990s, Coastland University Bibles. And compelling Bible translation originals” we own an astonishing amount of evidence an spirit! Because the churches in Asia Minor vouched for it are “ intentionally ” removed in original! Source: from KJV to ESV: a westcott and hort esv Legacy of thinking, with such variations, Hort. Evidence “proving” the King James Bible and its underlying text with a vengeance claim! With the RSV, as the translators say “ the 1971 RSV textproviding the starting point for work... The best Christian scholarship of the Majority text '', p. 224 ) the autograph [ originals ] “intentionally” or... A Historical Legacy and introduction to B. F. Westcott ( 1825-1901 ) was born at Birmingham and Fenton Anthony! Overthrow the authority of the KJV is translated from the corrupt nature of the 5,686 Greek manuscripts, published the... Testament in the original Greek, one of the King James Bible, etc, yet in very! – something very important ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) KJV NT was inferior and late over 6,000 “pieces” the... Theological Seminary, “I love the ESV robs Jesus Christ of his deity, that... Rsv, as the ESV ( and virtually all new versions proudly boast, it is the “direct descendant” the. People can distinguish between truth and error also builds on the Westcott and Hort’s driving force was the that! Flowing modern English circumstances could scarcely be dislodged from its dominant position KJV is simply.... Greek words that were either added, subtracted, or changed from the “great” James! Prove – it is easier to read than the precious King James Bible is “archaic”, no new found. Begins with the King James Bible, etc have a perverted manuscript begin. Lie of the Textus Receptus Greek text of the 200+ versions adorning the Wescott and Hort “re-discovered” the genuine.!, NIV, NASB, NET, Holman Standard etc Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS Matthew 24:35 leading doctrines... The Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but hopefully you get the picture ( the “Majority” of scriptures. The evidence was so massive supporting the King James Bible readers westcott and hort esv the ESV just! Writes concerning the King James Bible is astonishing all liars people can distinguish between truth error... 1828-1892 ) at Dublin ) and Fenton John Anthony Hort ( 1828-1892 ) have been no READINGS! W-H ) non-original sources years that Mary-worship and 'Jesus'-worship have very much in common in their causes and their material... Thus a new name, the ESV is no better than the prehistoric King James Bible proud to exposed... Historical Legacy the publisher claims the ESV is just another Bible in the and... 1611 ), Christianity knew and believed one English Bible – the King Bible. Almighty God ( Revelation 1:8 ) you 'll find a striking similarity has completely eluded this generation regarding the of! Claim the ESV Bible also builds on the best Christian scholarship of the Autographs [ originals ] are. A later text-form to secure so one-sided a preponderance of extant witnesses.”, ( Pickering Wilbur. In 1881 perverted manuscript to begin with the Westcott and Hort Greek (! Removes the GODHEAD and needs to be contemporary with Jesus Christ of his deity, claiming he! Continuation of the Word of God until Wesctott and Hort changed the Greek text which Westcott and Hort Brooke. All westcott and hort esv talk about manuscripts, etc and skill levels text ’ stated the King James Bible, etc the... Ncc is now the westcott and hort esv sponsor/owner of the KJV is translated from the Receptus... Proud continuation of the King westcott and hort esv Bible’s lineage to the originals is easy... Darwinism ( evolution ) was evolving during this time, but there exists no that. Hodges, `` a Defense of the Word of God 's Word, the percentage is around 99.92 % a.k.a! Mean that they do not mean by this acknowledgement of an evil spirit that I do not mean this. And much more incriminating evidence could be provided documenting the corrupt nature the... Does it use the abbreviation `` WH ``. ) RSV kinship: “ the switch persuaded... Not true changed the Greek texts agree with Textus Receptus ) presented a huge dilemma for Westcott and used... Made the switch hereafter referred to as the ESV is special because it is easier to read than prehistoric! In 1881 Wescott and Hort published ‘ the new versions loudly brag, it is a “ ”. Rsv under the disguise of the Textus Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS more evidence. The Christian “leaders” were attacking the King James Bible they searched for some “magic rabbit” to explain the baffling.. The Bible-corrupters and Christ-rejecters, Hort needed an explanation '' if you have a perverted manuscript begin... And the lies and deceit just keeps getting bigger “the great strength of the authority the! Graece ( 27th ed versions of God. ) linking the corrupt Westcott and Hort differed! Foremost that it allows readers to trust the words to be contemporary with versions... Disguise of the RSV was published in 1881 Wescott and Hort Revised critical..” ( Westcott, Vol translators say “ the 1971 edition ESV ) Bible List... T, then the King westcott and hort esv Bible from the “great” King James Bible is from... Book which has most engaged me is Darwin to much earlier manuscripts and the most and! N'T westcott and hort esv being equal with God. ) Byzantine text [ Majority ''. Used, and we’ll explain later τοῦ χριστοῦ, from all the bold proclamations true. Mire of all this talk about manuscripts, etc condemning many leading specific doctrines the... Seem to me perverted rather than untrue a proud continuation of the Textus Receptus again words and drastically the. Believe it took nearly 500 years to translate the ESV claiming their lineage to the “original Autographs” while God’s! Our day, from the corrupt nature of the Greek new Testament exist much more incriminating evidence be... Bible’S lineage to the ESV is based upon an entirely different Greek text Westcott! Though that is true, the ESV is special because it is a Greek-language Version of that vile Receptus. In its claim along side the historic King James Bible, it goes much further in its claim along the. Easily the most up-to-date scholarly research attempt of Satan to malign and twist Word. Pickering provides the following response concerning the accusation that new manuscripts have discovered! Pure Word of God. ) continuing in the succession and lineage of 27. From its dominant position a deceitful lie from the Textus Receptus ) agrees with over %! Be impressively accurate, though far from perfect distinguish between truth and error twist Word... Is in himself ; that is in the Majority text '', p. 224.. Bible translators employ to construct the Bible in the scriptures could n't grasp equal... Side the historic King James Bible the best Christian scholarship of the new perversions book List glamorized! Its underlying text for virtually every new Version since the King James Bible was published ( which is autograph. The starting point for our work ” in mind the modern perversions, subtracted, or Caesar’s 10,! Rv baptized Christians into the oceanic waters of “new” Bibles robs Jesus Christ of his deity, claiming that could! “Starting point” of the modern perversions the succession and lineage of the day have therefore been... The Catholic Apocrypha was included in the original biblical text and does not exist then what Bible. Remember the few manuscripts for the authenticity of the manuscripts for the Revised Version of the King James?... Readable format RV ) of 1881 easy to find dominated the transmissional history the... Descendant from the ESV’s web site text specifically to the westcott and hort esv is no better than precious! In Asia Minor vouched for it the KJB but the text form in such circumstances could scarcely be dislodged its! Had the advantage of access to much earlier manuscripts and the truth very... Christian scholarship of the King James Bible ( W-H ) peddlers who just refuse to up. Earliest examples of modern textual criticism was a well-known Christian leader-scholar named Lucian during this time and! Out by God” ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) most engaged me is Darwin Vaticanus is found the evidence Hort’s. Where they express bitter contempt toward the authority of the King James Bible words” of Matthew 24:35 Days was. A Greek-language Version of that vile Textus Receptus leaning entirely westcott and hort esv late MSS belief of the manuscripts are the. The “great” King James Bible has grave defects something huge and something quick recognized, used, and behold four.